January 29, 2010 in Linux Client | Comments (0)
Tags: Common Error Messages, Data Recovery Software, Demerits, Enterprise Linux, Example Of Open Source, Linux Source Code, Linux Users, Logical Drives, M486, Open Source Development, Phoenix Linux, Popular Operating System, Red Hat Enterprise, Reiser, Removable Media, Software Linux, Stellar Phoenix, System Call, Terminal Type, Type Linux
HTML clipboard
Linux is the most popular operating system so far as security and performance is concerned .It is a Unix-like operating system and is the best example of open source development and free software; generally all underlying Linux source code can be modified, redistributed and used freely by anyone. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.2 is the latest version of Linux operating system.
As we all know every operating system has its demerits or failures and can give errors at any time with out any prior information. There are some common error messages faced by Linux users while using this operating system. Some of the most common ones are the following:
• Unknown terminal type Linux.
• Unrecognized option ‘-m486′.
• bdflush not running
• cannot read table of mounted file systems
• Unknown terminal type Linux.
• Cannot initialize drive XYZ?
• EPERM Operation not permitted.
• Unrecognized option ‘-m486′.
• Modprobe can’t locate module, “XXX,” and similar messages.
• Mounting unchecked file system.
• EINTR Interrupted system call.
In most the situations given above a user faces any of the mentioned problems, it becomes difficult for him/her to access or manage his data. He/she won’t be able to do normal tasks which can otherwise be performed effortlessly. If the data which has been rendered inaccessible is important then it becomes essential to recover that data as soon as possible. In this case, he/she would need the help of Linux data recovery software.
Linux Data Recovery Software is an ultimate way out for all Linux related data recovery problems. It also recovers data from formatted hard drives also where file systems have been changed. It recovers lost logical drives and data from physical disk or any removable media.
Stellar Phoenix Linux Recovery software provides data recovery from Ext2, Ext2 and Reiser FS file systems of Linux operating system.
By: allen
in Linux Client | Comments (0)
Tags: Constructive Cost Model, David A Wheeler, David Wheeler, Decision Software, Developer Programs, Enterprise Linux, Fedora, Linux Distribution, Linux Kernel, Linux Market, Lora, Market Demands, Mcpherson, Open Source Code, Proprietary Software, Random Projects, Red Hat Enterprise, Relevant Model, Salary Adjustments, Software Vendors
Lora Bentley spoke with Amanda McPherson, marketing and developer programs VP at the Linux Foundation. She and two colleagues recently released a new paper, “Estimating the Total Development Cost of a Linux Distribution.”
Bentley: Your study found that it would cost $1.4 billion for a company to build the Linux kernel from scratch today, and $10.8 billion to build an entire Linux distribution similar to Fedora 9. Can you explain how you reached those figures?
McPherson: The conclusions were reached by using David Wheeler’s well-known SLOC tool, SLOCCount, which makes use of the industry standard COnstructive COst MOdel (COCOMO). This methodology takes into account lines of code written, the appropriate number of labor years, and salary adjustments for inflation. We wanted to come up with a real number based on the one thing you can quantify in open source — code. We used a well-regarded methodology and tool that had been used before. Instead of making random projects, we thought this was the best way to approach it.
Bentley: Why the Fedora community distribution and not another?
McPherson: Fedora is the basis for Red Hat Enterprise Linux, which represents a large percentage of the Linux market. This provided us with a very relevant model to assess. Also, David A. Wheeler had used Red Hat for his study in 2002. OpenSuse and Debian/Ubuntu would, of course, also be great targets for this study. We may do that at a later date. We also would like to use an embedded distribution.
Bentley: What do or should these findings mean to proprietary software vendors?
McPherson: I think it means the future of software development is collaborative. These systems have grown so powerful and so important that for any one company to fund the development on its own would be a foolish and possibly financially untenable decision. Software development today actually requires collaboration in order to innovate at the pace the market demands. Consider devices like the Kindle and Gphone. They wouldn’t likely be available today were it not for the billions of dollars worth of R&D that they can use from the Linux kernel. You see companies like Intel using Linux and open source components in the Moblin project to expand the use of netbooks running its products. Intel could instead develop proprietary software in-house to meet this need, but why would they when they can make use of billions of dollars of free R&D? Things have changed since the desktop computer revolution.
Bentley: Don’t many proprietary software vendors recognize the value of open source now given that so many use open source in some way or another?
McPherson: Absolutely! You can also look at our “Who Writes Linux” report to see that hundreds of companies support Linux development directly. This study shows that those companies (such as IBM, Intel, Red Hat, Novell and HP) have made a very smart decision. They can fully participate in a large ecosystem and make use of free R&D without having to shoulder the burden all alone.
Bentley: So why is a study like this one helpful?
McPherson: Sometimes it’s easy to take a ubiquitous piece of technology for granted, especially one you can use for free. I think it’s not just Linux we take for granted: Just imagine the R&D value of the Internet itself and what that means for our economy. Compared to that, Linux seems small, yet when you think about all the innovation it’s powered or is powering, you start to get the idea. I honestly can’t imagine where we would be if Google had had to pay a company a per-server fee for its servers. I do not believe the economics would have been there to build out the powerful search network that we all use everyday. This study makes us appreciate the sometimes-unheralded piece of software and the license that has powered this innovation.
Bentley: Do the findings have added significance in light of the current economic climate?
McPherson: I think so. Linux has always been a lower-cost alternative to Windows, but this report illustrates its economic impact on technology innovation. It’s exciting to see how the collaborative development model is fueling a new category of devices and technologies that would be at least a decade into the future if it weren’t for Linux. Let’s remember that in software, time is money; oftentimes time is more important than money. For a company like Google or Intel to be able to make use of this code that has taken years to develop, drives innovation and keeps costs low for consumers.
By: Lora Bentley
in Linux Client | Comments (0)
Tags: Board Scales, Budgetary Constraints, Cheap Web Hosting Services, Commerce Database, Comparative View, Customizations, Database Systems, Database Utilities, Hosting Server, Hullabaloo, Licensing Fee, Open Source Software, Scale Business, Scale Web, Software Product, Web Based Database, Web Host Services, Web Hosting Servers, Web Hosting Services, Web Masters
Indeed, complex features, like e-commerce, database utilities and bulky dynamic pages invite different nature of web hosting requirements than a much simpler and lighter web site. Obviously small scale web masters cannot afford to surpass their budgetary constraints in order to chase technology at its latest. In the given scenario, triggers on the search for cheap and efficient web hosting services for across the board scales and sizes of websites by their respective web masters. And as the quest for cheap web hosting services assumes pace, all hopes turn to Linux web host services for obvious reasons.
Linux web hosting, being an open source software product, is not only substantially cheaper, but also provides a lot of scope for customizations and enhancements at advanced stages. Apparently, Linux – based hosting is most popular with small scale business owners vying to make it big on World Wide Web.
Delving deeper into the advantages of Linux hosting over windows –based hosting reveals that there are different layers of reasons that put Linux –based web host services over and above the Windows –based web host services.
To begin with, the licensing fee for Linux hosting plan is way lower than Windows hosting that contributes to its cheaper status.
Further, Linux web hosting servers can support much more complex nature of websites with equal ease as they sustain the simpler websites. What’s most noteworthy about it is that quality is not at all compromised in the process.
Also, a Linux hosting server is conveniently convertible to a Windows based website without any hullabaloo.
Linux web host services are compatible with all kinds of web – based database systems, including My-SQL and MS-SQL. Likewise, all kinds of open source scripting languages like My-SQL, PHP and Perl can easily communicate with your website through Linux web hosting.
Not to mention, the extent of security offered by Linux based web hosting services is matchless, as compared to any other hosting service.
Given the breadth of advantages of Linux web hosting, coupled with both technology and ambitions on a rise; it is ubiquitously witnessed on a global scale that there are more companies working on the Linux hosting, than on any other web host services. Linux web hosting is an easily predictable future of all web host services, because it is safe, fast, friendly and cheap.
By: Smit Mathur